Our terms explained
Getting to grips with the terminology used in our investigation process can be a challenge, so we have explained some of the most frequently used terms below, including the main people and committees involved.
Only the Disciplinary Committee can issue a formal warning to a veterinary surgeon.
However, situations may arise where either the Case Examiner Group (in deciding that there is no arguable case to progress matters to Stage 2) or the Preliminary Investigation Committee (in deciding that there is no reasonable prospect of a finding against the veterinary surgeon should the case progress to a Disciplinary Hearing) may nevertheless still have concerns about what the veterinary surgeon has done (or not done).
In these situations, advice may be issued to the veterinary surgeon, for example:
- change practice protocols or procedures
- undertake additional continuing professional development (CPD),
- reminder about the provisions in the Code of Professional Conduct or supporting guidance.
Advice from the College remains on a veterinary surgeon's records and if, in the future, similar concerns are raised, the fact that advice was issued may be taken into account.
Case Examiner Group
A Case Examiner Group is allocated to each concern raised with us. It comprises 3 individuals: one Case Manager, one veterinary Case Examiner and one non-veterinary Case Examiner who, together, carry out the assessment and investigation of concerns raised with us (Stage 1).
Veterinary surgeon and non-veterinary members of the Preliminary Investigation Committee.
Case Managers are part of the Professional Conduct Department and may be legally qualified. Together with one veterinary Case Examiner and one non-veterinary Case Examiner, they make up a Case Examiner Group which carries out the assessment and investigation of concerns.
Code of Professional Conduct
See 'Disciplinary Committee'.
Disciplinary Committee (DC)
The RCVS equivalent of a court where charges are heard against a veterinary surgeon alleging that he or she is guilty of serious professional misconduct (the wording of the Veterinary Surgeons Act 1966 is ‘disgraceful conduct in a professional respect’), or that he or she is unfit to practise because of a criminal conviction.
The DC hears evidence on oath and witnesses are cross examined. It currently has 16 members and the quorum is 5 members, of whom 2 must be non-veterinary surgeons and 2 must be veterinary surgeons.
A request to the Courts that an administrative decision, for example, a decision by the Preliminary Committee, be reviewed.
Please see our separate note on negligence.
See 'Preliminary Investigation Committee'
Preliminary Investigation Committee (PIC)
The Preliminary Investigation Committee (PIC) is a statutory committee under the Veterinary Surgeons 1966. Each year 6 veterinary surgeons and 3 non-veterinary members are appointed to the PIC to assist the assessment and investigation of concerns.
The PIC meets monthly to decide if cases should be referred to a Disciplinary Committee hearing. The PIC Chairman provides a report to RCVS Council at the Council’s 3 meetings each year.
The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council hears appeals made by a veterinary surgeon against a Disciplinary Committee decision that his/her name should be suspended or removed from the RCVS Register.
Professional Conduct Department
The Professional Conduct Department of the RCVS includes legally-qualified staff, Professional Conduct Officers and administrative staff. It manages complaints and provides advice on the Codes of Professional Conduct. The Department is based at the RCVS premises in London.
The governing body of the RCVS, as provided for in the Veterinary Surgeons Act 1966.
The RCVS Register is a list of those persons who are entitled to practise as veterinary surgeons in the UK, in accordance with the provisions of the Veterinary Surgeons Act 1966. Veterinary surgeons on the register use the postnominal letters 'MRCVS' (Member of the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons) or FRCVS (Fellow of the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons).
Serious professional misconduct
This is a term used to describe conduct by a veterinary surgeon that is so serious as to warrant consideration of the veterinary surgeon’s continued registration with the RCVS, ie their fitness to practise as a veterinary surgeon. This is behaviour that falls far short of that to be expected of a veterinary surgeon.
A case will be referred to the Disciplinary Committee only if there is a real prospect of proving serious professional misconduct against a veterinary surgeon.
Veterinary Investigators (of whom there are currently 3) are registered veterinary surgeons with appropriate experience (such as approved Practice Standards Inspectors) who we appoint to assist with investigations of concerns raised about veterinary surgeons.
Their responsibilities could include visits to veterinary practices and interviews with veterinary surgeons about whom concerns have been raised, practice staff; those who have raised concerns and other witnesses.